cover

Journal of Islamic Studies and Thought for Specialized Research

About the Journal :

Journal of Islamic studies and thought for specialized research, a magazine working in the field of intellectual reform and knowledge, as one of the pillars of the project of contemporary Islamic civilization.

The magazine seeks to be a port for scientists, thinkers, researchers and intellectuals to work hard to reform the Islamic thought and methodology at the nation level, exceeding the boundaries of language and region, to serve humanity as a whole in order to achieve the greater goal of promoting the levels of human thought at the global level.

The Journal of Islamic Studies and Thought for Specialized Research aims at providing high-quality scientific research in order to provide an excellent scientific material. It is useful for researchers, intellectuals and specialists to form a scientific reference in the process of achieving our vision. The magazine undertakes to communicate with researchers and writers from different walks of life to promote their research and articles. Including the scientific movement and intellectual efforts in the field of reform and promotion of the system of human thought.



THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF PRAISE AND SLANDER ASSESSMENT STUDY IN THE LIGHT OF THE BOOK AND THE YEAR

This research attempts to reveal the differences between the agreement and disagreement of the discrepancy in Fiqh. It is an evaluation study in the light of Quran and Sunnah.The study consists of an introduction, two chapters and a conclusion. The first chapter discusses the concept of differentiation in Fiqh. Secondly, it shows the dissimilarity between the two words (Ikhtilaf-difference) and (khelaf-dispute). Then, it demonstrates the historical overview of the variance Fiqh phases. The second chapter, involves the stand of the jurists about this issue and as a result the jurists are divided into two groups, praises the differences in Fiqh due to requirements of the Sharia texts. On the other hand, the second group disagrees with the issue. At the end, the results have been declared significantly.